The NASCAR schedule is one of the most anticipated announcement moments of every season. It is something that recently has become exciting as NASCAR makes relevant and relatively large changes and we are at the point of clamoring for them every year. With this though there is one big question, the NASCAR schedule question…
Visit the Merch Store Here:
Video Credits:
Avenged Sevenfold
Chiptune Planet
FOX Sports
Full NASCAR Races
Ghost
Idk Player
Motorsports on NBC
NASCAR
NASCAR on FOX
NBC Sports
Racing America
ScorpAKWAL
Stacking Pennies
Turner Sports
3 Doors Down
Thumbnail Credits:
John Harrelson
Motorsport Images
Outro Song:
Strang Animal (Crowder Remix) by Gowan
Songs:
Ghost – Mary On A Cross | Arcade Version uploaded by ScorpAKWAL
3 Doors Down – When I’m Gone (8 bit) uploaded by Chiptune Planet
3 Doors Down – Kryptonite (8 bit) uploaded by Chiptune Planet
Avenged Sevenfold – Afterlife (8 bit) uploaded by Chiptune Planet
#nascar #motorsports #racing
47 comments
What tracks do you think will lose dates?
Texas :copium:
I think Richmond will go down to 1 race
Phoenix, Vegas, Kansas don’t need a 2nd date – Close down Texas Motor Speedway
Richmond And Bristol lose a date.
Richmond, Phoenix and Texas all need to go
I say Phoenix and Richmond should loose a date
Yes
Honestly, it would make a lot more sense for us to have Sonoma as the end cap or middle part of the West Coast Swing. It certainly would make it a lot more beautiful to race in rather than the sand ruins we go to in the summer.
the reason Sonoma is where it is because that is turning the tourist season so it will not change
Mud parking lots on steep hills means mudslides in rain.
What I wouldn’t give to have any nascar series in Montreal
Iowa Speedway is owned by Nascar
The strange part is they own it directly rather than through ISC.
@@raritania7581ISC Is Nascar
I think Richmond should lose it’s summer date because I think a second Richmond race is not needed.
I don’t think Richmond deserves a date at all with this package
Richmond doesn’t need 2 dates
Hot take no double dates
@@samueladiwinata3440 Few double dates. Only tracks that should get two dates are ones that fill or at least mostly fill the stands for both races. If a track with two dates go multiple seasons in a row with subpar attendance at one of their races, they lose that date.
Had 2 dates 15 years ago and nobody complained
Ehhh, I don’t mind doubles that much unless its Pheonix that track has no business having 2 dates.
Richmond shouldn’t have 1 date!
A lot is solved by going down to one race per track. You obviously have contracts to work around or wait on to expire. But the cool thing about a contract is no once can force you to renew. Limit tracks to one date in all their new deals and over time fill in new tracks as those dates are made available. It’ll help pack the stands at tracks too with combined fans
All tracks reduced to only one race, but not Daytona neither the 500 or 400 should be taken off the calendar
this is the answer, allows change but lets us never abandon another track. Theres no reason to leave places, but one race per place will free up alot, the exception for me is the roval. I just really like it. im sorry.
Tracks wanted on the schedule the most: 1.) Rockingham 2.) Chicagoland 3.) Road America
Maybe dump ROVAL and Chicago Streets to have less road courses. Maybe 4 dates Glen, Sonoma, COTA, and rotational date?
Pikes peak international in Colorado would be a badass race
Chicagoland is never coming back give it up
@@ImSorryLittleOne sorry to break it you its still running strong and perfect shape and having events. and i heard it might comeback after the street race deal is finished. and i work at Chicagoland.
Don’t you dare talk about getting rid of homestead
I think the Roval should go to the Charlotte oval. Drop Chicago street race. Do a rotation of COTA, Road America, Mexico City, and Montreal. Say in even numbered years they do COTA and Montreal, and in odd numbered years they do RA and Mexico City so there is always an international race on the schedule. I know the racing at Road America was only okay but plenty of people showed up. Drop a date from Richmond, Martinsville, Phoenix, Bristol, Las Vegas, Kansas, and Atlanta and add a date for Chicagoland, Nashville Fairgrounds, Rockingham, North Wilkesboro, and Auto Club, Kentucky, and Milwaukee. Renovate Texas into an intermediate superspeedway like Atlanta. Do the clash at any 1/2 mile short track in Florida or California and do the All-Star race at any 1/2 mile short track in Virginia or North Carolina.
I believe that is still 36 points paying races that visits every large oval in the US and checks the box of an international race every year. It just doesn’t have dirt or a street race, both of which are fine with me.
i agree drop street race add Chicagoland
Most tracks should only have 1 date per year.
At an autograph signing, Ricky Stenhouse said to me he would love to see IRP on the schedule. I will admit, that would be cool but you couldn’t find many places to watch the race besides the front stretch.
I’ve been wanting Cup at IRP my whole life. I love that track
@@jonriggs4409is that track big enough for cup?
Tracks like Kansas and Vegas don’t need 2 dates. Especially when tracks like Kentucky and Chicagoland are off the schedule currently
and vegas is terrible as the assoftex
And Chicagoland if they are smart, could sell the terrain to amazon and have amazon to sponsor the track and also serve as a warehouse and shop for car parts
Hold up Kansas is great racing both times and Kansas and Missouri fans love that track. Kansas has earned its 2 races
Quite a few interesting opinions here. Homestead isn’t irrelevant it’s a mile and a half it’s a good track many people want it too have 2 dates. It’s a unique mile and a half provides good racing
There’s no good tracks to go that actually make a difference Cota is great had a good cup race this year but I wana see a oval
In a perfect world Cota is Chicago land and Kentucky is Chicago street course
can we talk about how in the beginning, he was using mary on a cross by ghost synth version as the background music
Road courses and the east coast intermediates and short tracks should rotate cup dates every season or two. Each cup date will feel more special and you will see more people in the stands.
Leaving out the Bristol Night Race as a Crown Jewel is criminal.
I think Richmond, bit like what happened with Pocono, could benefit from dropping to one date and making a bigger deal out of only having one date as it does have a place on the calendar
Richmond earn 2 Dates so much to do
It might seem complicated but it’s really not. Only tracks that should have two dates are as follows: Daytona, Charlotte, Martinsville, Kansas, and maybe Talladega.
Easy in principle