
The latest courtroom battle between Joe Gibbs Racing, Chris Gabehart and Spire Motorsports ended Thursday without any immediate rulings, but the first day of the discovery hearing brought several important issues to the surface.
The hearing focused largely on disputes over what documents and information should be produced before the case heads toward trial. Five motions were on the agenda, involving JGR, Spire, Gabehart and other parties connected to the dispute.
According to FOX Sports’ Bob Pockrass, one of the most notable developments was JGR’s allegation that Gabehart continued to have access to some JGR information through June on a different device that had not been scrubbed.
That does not establish that Gabehart accessed, used or shared the information during that period. Pockrass noted after the hearing that it was not specified what device was involved or when the information was last accessed.
Those details could become important because one of the motions before the court concerns metadata that could potentially show when Gabehart accessed JGR information in his possession.
Spire Motorsports Wants a Final List of JGR Trade Secrets

Another major issue involved the trade secrets at the center of the lawsuit.
Spire argued that JGR should provide a definitive list of the trade secrets it claims were misappropriated. Spire’s attorneys said JGR has continued identifying additional examples of allegedly misappropriated information, making it difficult for the defendants to prepare their case as the February trial approaches.
JGR, however, argued that its discovery process is still uncovering additional examples of information that Gabehart allegedly possessed or potentially used.
The dispute over the scope of the alleged trade secrets could therefore become an important issue heading into trial.
Why Toyota Is Now Part of the Discovery Fight
Toyota Racing Development also became a significant part of Thursday’s proceedings.
Spire Motorsports is seeking the full technical agreement between JGR and Toyota to determine whether some of the information JGR identifies as trade secrets could actually belong to Toyota rather than JGR.
That distinction could also affect damages.
Spire wants to examine payments made to Toyota for technical information to determine whether those amounts should be included in JGR’s damages calculations.
Toyota has objected to producing the full agreement, with its attorneys arguing that the documents contain proprietary information. A portion of the agreement may be produced, but the broader request remains disputed.
Hendrick Motorsports Also Raises Concerns
Hendrick Motorsports appeared in the hearing as an interested non-party because of its technical relationship with Spire.
Hendrick’s attorneys told the court they wanted to protect the team’s own proprietary information from being exposed through the discovery process.
According to RACER, JGR and Hendrick had already reached an agreement under which JGR would not seek certain highly sensitive Hendrick competition information. Hendrick would also have an opportunity to review and redact protected information before it reaches JGR’s attorneys.
The issue highlights how the Gabehart case extends beyond the two teams directly involved. Information belonging to Toyota and Hendrick could potentially be caught up in the discovery process.
No Decisions Yet, Rulings Expected Monday
After hearing the arguments, the court finished for the day without ruling on the motions.
Bob Pockrass reported that one motion concerns the metadata that could help determine when Gabehart accessed JGR information, while another seeks a final list of the trade secrets JGR is alleging in the case.
The judge is expected to issue decisions Monday.
The case is currently scheduled for a jury trial beginning February 1, 2027, with the proceedings expected to last several days.
For now, Day One did not settle the central dispute between JGR and Gabehart. Instead, it exposed another layer of the fight: exactly what information is at issue, who owns it, who can access it and what evidence the parties will be allowed to use when the case eventually reaches trial.
Also Read:: NASCAR Chase Viewership Surges 6%: Is the Playoff Formula Working?
More must-reads:
